|
Would possession of a completely disassembled Category 3 'assault weapon" constitute an unlawful possession of an "assault weapon?" |
 |
 |
 |
|
Written by Administrator
|
|
Monday, 29 November 1999 16:00 |
|
In practical terms, if someone has removed any SG23 offending feature(s) from their rifle so that it is no longer an "assault weapon," are they in violation of the law if they continue to possess the removed feature along with the rifle?
According to a letter dated May 1, 2003, Tim Rieger, Deputy Attorney General of the Department of Justice states: No. |
|
Last Updated on Tuesday, 28 April 2009 10:41 |
