On May 6, 2013, the Second Appellate District of the California Court of Appeals ruled that certain people convicted of violating California Penal Code section 242 (battery) are not prohibited from possessing firearms under the federal law that prohibits those with a conviction for a “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence” (MCDV) from possessing firearms. Shirey v. Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission, (2013) 216 Cal.App.4th 1 [156 Cal.Rptr.3d 517].

The decision clarifies that thousands of Californians previously thought to be prohibited from possessing firearms are not prohibited after all.

The State of California sought review of the Shirey decision by the California Supreme Court. DOJ also sought to have the case depublished so that it would not have a binding effect on lower courts. Thankfully, the California Supreme Court denied both requests. Such a denial often indicates that the lower court’s analysis is correct and should remain binding precedent. The State may appeal this case to the United States Supreme Court, if they do, this case is unlikely to interest the high court.

As a result of this ruling, a person convicted of a misdemeanor 242 (and 243(e))1 should not be considered prohibited for a federal MCDV if the level of force used was minimal or the DOJ cannot determine what level of force was used. Nevertheless, we expect that DOJ will still continue to consider people prohibited from possessing firearms or delay their firearm transaction until the individual can prove otherwise.

People who are uncertain of their eligibility to possess and own firearms in California should request a Personal Firearms Eligibility Check using the form provided by the California Department of Justice website. You should never attempt to purchase a firearm in order to test your eligibility in California. California is being particularly aggressive in seizing firearms from people prohibited from possessing them. Many people

  • (CA) L.A. council moves to require that unused guns be locked up or disabled November 28, 2014 C.D. MichelLos Angeles lawmakers voted Tuesday to start drafting a city ordinance that would require residents to lock up their handguns or disable them with trigger locks when they aren’t being used. The lawmakers are following in the footsteps of San Francisco, which was challenged by gun owners after it passed a similar law seven years ago. ...
  • (CA) Kamala Harris, gun-control group still trying to intervene in concealed-carry case November 27, 2014 C.D. MichelCalifornia Attorney General Kamala Harris and a national gun-control group are asking a federal appeals court to reconsider their effort to intervene in a case that could dramatically loosen California’s restrictions on concealed handguns. The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence filed papers Wednesday asking that an 11-judge “en banc” panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit ...
  • (CA) New appeal on concealed gun law change November 27, 2014 C.D. MichelSAN DIEGO — The legal fight over Californians’ right to carry concealed weapons is facing another appeal in federal court, a move that will continue to delay the issuing of gun permits under looser restrictions in the county. The state Attorney General’s Office and the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence on Wednesday said they plan ...
  • (CA) Thank You from the NRA Here is what your Contributions Made Possible in 2014 November 26, 2014 C.D. MichelAs we celebrate the Thanksgiving holiday, the NRA would like to thank its members and donors for their valuable contributions this year.  Without your continued support, the NRA would not be able to do what they do in the fight for your Second Amendment rights. The NRA, its lobbyists, and its lawyers  have been heavily involved ...
  • (CA) California Attorney General Seeks En Banc Review of Ninth Circuit’s Denial of Her Request to Intervene in Peruta Case November 26, 2014 C.D. MichelNovember 26, 2014 – Today, California Attorney General (AG) Kamala Harris filed a request for en banc review of the Ninth Circuit’s denial of her request to intervene in the NRA supported case of Peruta v. San Diego, which produced a landmark decision striking down as a violation of the Second Amendment San Diego County Sheriff William Gore’s ...

Comments (1)

  • michael canepa


    Great article and good news, please keep me on your e-mailing list.

    PS Been affiliated with the NRA since 1949 and just renewed my membership !!!


Leave a comment